Since i wrote on planets in detriment, i’ve thought about them in some depth. What i said just wasn’t informed enough, in respect to the recognised authorities or to what other bloggers had written in their work; still i feel it showed my rather instanteneous thoughts quite well, but i don’t want to leave it like that, so here’s a bit more.
Let’s make sure you know what a planet in detriment is? it is one placed in the opposite sign to its designated ‘natural’ home sign[s]; and isn’t going to feel ‘at home’?, because it is in an alien land to the one it is at home in.
Take my Jupiter in Gemini [please do, its been a pain in the arse all my life], just joking there!!. Seriously though it sits in Mercury’s sign and feels and acts in ways more natural to Mercury than Jupiter, its more like a ‘glut/lot’ of Mercury than anything recognisably Jupiterian.
For me perhaps that is the point, it is less ‘Jupiterian’ and more ‘Mercurial’, if you understand what i’m saying here?, it is something ‘different’ to its normal expression.
So how will it express itself in my life? i suppose it must depend on what it signifies/rules in my natal chart, but i am not going to get that far into it, right now.
Looking at it again, am i any closer to understanding what astrological detriment means? No i don’t think so, i feel i can only put forward this; that a planet placed like this, could be uncomfortable and ‘out-of-place’, i, like others i’ve read on detriments don’t believe it is weakened by being placed like this, but it has to have some meaning, so i turn to the best man.
We should all read ‘William Lily’ who describes ‘the detrimented state’, and when he says something on the subject, [it is best advised to listen-up]. On natal judgements and the ‘quality of manners’, he speaks about all the planet[s]; just what they signify by being ‘well’ or ‘ill’ posited; and he sees a planet that is in detriment as being ill posited; thus showing a definite difference in manner, to a planet that is not ill posited. It is different for each planet, so please read and learn it yourself.
He is a very good authority and i bow-down and accept his words, following his path, doubting i’ll ever know better. Always remembering that the discovery of astrology never happens in isolation, reminding ourselves too that one of astrology’s main lesson[s] is that we must as [astrologer's] relate all astrology [to a person, question or event], to make it valid. I know this only too well, as i have been guilty of ‘too-wide a focus’ at times.
P.S. [been guilty of 'too-wide a focus' at times], is great words for a time when the Moon is in the sign of the archer.